Updated June 22, 2026
See how neighborhoods in Jupiter compare on visual appeal. Rankings are based on measured data aggregated across each neighborhood boundary. How visual appeal is measured →
Custom architecture and extensive privacy buffers create a highly aesthetic environment that is notably more visually polished than the Jupiter average. According to iHuus data, the presence of low density estates and high end amenities contributes to an exceptionally well maintained landscape.
Custom architecture and extensive privacy buffers create a highly scenic environment that sits well above the Jupiter average. According to iHuus data, the area features premium landscaping alongside numerous private pools and tennis courts.
Low density housing featuring custom architecture and significant privacy buffers provides a highly scenic environment. This level of visual quality sits well above the Jupiter average according to iHuus data.
| Neighborhood | Score | City Rank | vs. City Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear's Club | 9.3 | #1 | +1.8 ↑ |
| Admirals Cove | 9 | #2 | +1.5 ↑ |
| Ritz Carlton | 9 | #3 | +1.5 ↑ |
| Admirals Cove Golf Village | 8.3 | #4 | +0.8 ↑ |
| Canterbury | 8 | #5 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Egret Landing | 8 | #6 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Hamptons | 8 | #7 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Loxahatchee Club | 8 | #8 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Martinique | 8 | #9 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Loxahatchee Reserve | 8 | #10 | +0.5 ↑ |
| The Heights of Jupiter | 8 | #11 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Mallory Creek | 8 | #12 | +0.5 ↑ |
| New Haven | 8 | #13 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Paseos | 8 | #14 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Tuscany | 8 | #15 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Valencia | 8 | #16 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Windsor Park | 8 | #17 | +0.5 ↑ |
| Riverside Drive Park | 7.7 | #18 | +0.2 ↑ |
| Indian Creek | 7.7 | #19 | +0.2 ↑ |
| Cambridge | 7.3 | #20 | -0.2 ↓ |
| Jupiter Village | 7 | #21 | -0.5 ↓ |
| Bluffs | 6.8 | #22 | -0.7 ↓ |
| Pine Gardens South | 6.7 | #23 | -0.8 ↓ |
| Jupiter Island | 6.4 | #24 | -1.1 ↓ |
iHuus Neighborhood Intelligence Insights
No credit card required